A snake knows the snake's way: Hawk faction > 자유게시판 이지마켓

The series of commotions surrounding the mispayment of benefits from the government of Abu Town in Yamaguchi Prefecture to its citizens is moving in an unexpected direction. At first, the tabloids were reporting almost daily on the pursuit of responsibility of the recipient after the incident was discovered and the background of the person who was slow to repay the money. Most people probably thought that it was impossible to recover the money from this recipient. However, even though the recipient commented that he had "spent it all" as soon as he was arrested by the police, for some reason the settlement agent returned 90% of the money to Abu Town. The town that mistakenly sent the money must be relieved that they were able to recover some of it, but why did the agent easily return it at this timing? In the first place, can the money be returned even though the arrested recipient said that he had "spent it all"? There seems to be a trick to this contradiction, and it seems that the "spent it all" was a lie and the money was simply transferred from the bank account to the agent, and it should be considered that it was properly pooled. Normally, if the recipients were to escape from the town and the public knew that they had spent it all on online casinos as they had commented, then even if they served their sentence, the money they had saved up after their release would be on the internet, so they would be able to get it back. However, if they were caught by the police, and asked in detail about the whereabouts of the money and the details of the case, they would be unable to avoid the existence of the agency. If that happens, the police will likely expand the scope of their investigation to include the agency. If that happens, information about the flow of money through the agency and other financial matters will leak out. The agency is a so-called underground financial company that does not appear in public, and it is possible that they were moving a large amount of money from the underworld, so they probably did not want their existence to be made public through this incident, and instead thought that there was a high possibility that they would be exposed. That is why I think that the agency paid the money back to the town even though it was on their behalf, diverting the attention of the investigating authorities from them. From the agency's perspective, it would be a matter of life and death to lose the trust and business with other customers because of a single person, so they quickly returned the money before that happened. However, I think this action was the contradiction in the course of the case and the trigger for the investigation to begin. It's a classic example of how actions you think are for the good can come back to haunt you. There's no doubt that the existence of this agency will be highlighted in the future, and it's no exaggeration to say that it's not a matter of indifference to the people who use it.







The series of commotions surrounding the mispayment of benefits from the government of Abu Town in Yamaguchi Prefecture to its citizens is moving in an unexpected direction. At first, the tabloids were reporting almost daily on the pursuit of responsibility of the recipient after the incident was discovered and the background of the person who was slow to repay the money. Most people probably thought that it was impossible to recover the money from this recipient. However, even though the recipient commented that he had "spent it all" as soon as he was arrested by the police, for some reason the settlement agent returned 90% of the money to Abu Town. The town that mistakenly sent the money must be relieved that they were able to recover some of it, but why did the agent easily return it at this timing? In the first place, can the money be returned even though the arrested recipient said that he had "spent it all"? There seems to be a trick to this contradiction, and it seems that the "spent it all" was a lie and the money was simply transferred from the bank account to the agent, and it should be considered that it was properly pooled. Normally, if the recipients were to escape from the town and the public knew that they had spent it all on online casinos as they had commented, then even if they served their sentence, the money they had saved up after their release would be on the internet, so they would be able to get it back. However, if they were caught by the police, and asked in detail about the whereabouts of the money and the details of the case, they would be unable to avoid the existence of the agency. If that happens, the police will likely expand the scope of their investigation to include the agency. If that happens, information about the flow of money through the agency and other financial matters will leak out. The agency is a so-called underground financial company that does not appear in public, and it is possible that they were moving a large amount of money from the underworld, so they probably did not want their existence to be made public through this incident, and instead thought that there was a high possibility that they would be exposed. That is why I think that the agency paid the money back to the town even though it was on their behalf, diverting the attention of the investigating authorities from them. From the agency's perspective, it would be a matter of life and death to lose the trust and business with other customers because of a single person, so they quickly returned the money before that happened. However, I think this action was the contradiction in the course of the case and the trigger for the investigation to begin. It's a classic example of how actions you think are for the good can come back to haunt you. There's no doubt that the existence of this agency will be highlighted in the future, and it's no exaggeration to say that it's not a matter of indifference to the people who use it.